Ursula Damm – Turnstile
						Text by Anja Schürmann
»A current of organic life surges from these communal groups – which share a common destiny – to their ornaments, endowing these ornaments with a magic force and burdening them with meaning to such an extent that they cannot be reduced to a pure assemblage of lines.« (Siegfried Kracauer)*
The Mass Ornament by Siegfried Kracauer also has a connection to the 
artistic work of Ursula Damm. Her design of the Schadowstraße U-Bahn 
station can be roughly divided into two parts: First the passerby is 
received in a space outfitted in blue glass tiles. On the tiles are 21 
aerial photographs of Dusseldorf’s land registry showing the city in 
maps corresponding to their compass points. There is a detail of 
Golzheim in the northern part of the station, in the south you can see 
Bilk, and so on. 
The artist subjected these maps to a geometrical process, which is 
rendered as a guide to the station: starting from the main traffic 
arteries the streets are axes of movement to other streets in a 
geometric ratio, enclosed by a surface with several corners – a polygon.
 From these polygons the angles and axes form larger, more symmetrical 
polygons that can be used to aid the different sections of the map. With
 these large structures, Damm attempts to create a relationship between 
the two-dimensional surfaces, like parks or housing blocks, on the maps 
to link the abstract structures back to the »energy centers which have 
adapted to each other during the development of the urban architecture.«
 
The centerpiece of Turnstile is a large LED screen on the tunnel level, 
stretching between two light shafts and connected to a video camera 
located above ground on Schadowstraße. It is there that the data for 
visualization is collected: real-time movements of passersby are filmed 
and transmitted to the screen and are then collected as a statistical 
mean. People can also interact with a polygon here, the direction of 
their movements has the capability of disrupting the stability of the 
geometric forms. In this way, the connections between passersby are 
re-established and reach beyond to be further considered and calculated.
 
Schadowstraße and its U-Bahn mark a turnstile where the greatest 
concentration of traffic meets in the city center and the most people 
are transported in any number of ways; whereas the second part of the 
word turnstile points simultaneously to a tile, a panel. On this screen 
there is the perspective of things being seen rather than what is seen, 
in the sense of concentrated layers, so that the original collection of 
data remains abstract and yet perceptible. The operation follows the 
thesis that in addition to what is constructed in urban centers there 
exists yet another form of architecture, fed by the energetic footsteps 
of passersby, their short-term relationships and their movements. The 
geometric forms seen on the LED screen refuse to understand the people 
as a mass and to assume their behavior is predictable, because they 
develop individual, non-repeatable gaits. On the empty spots of the most
 frequented locations created by the space designed by the software. 
From here, centers are identifiable, marked in white and constantly seek
 out new, flexible points of contact to other centers. The result is a 
virtual architecture that is always adaptable to interact with the 
people who use the space. Similar to Vitruvius, the ancient 
architectural theorist, here, man is the measure of all things. Yet, it 
is not a static, rather a moving, person that Damm has in mind to 
reverse the hierarchy of built-up and utilized urban space. 
As a counterpoint and correction of a hegemonic narrative, the artist 
offers an alternative count on several levels. The design asks if it’s 
possible to generalize individual behavior, as a person of distinct 
perspectives, and transfer them into parameters which correspond to 
swarm movements. And, does the way we move in public space have 
consequences for larger structures, for architects or for entire 
neighborhoods? Are urban structures at all anthropomorphic, in that they
 resemble human behavior? If so, then every step is safe or reasonable, 
because every step structures, marks and – thus the instructions at the 
station are only logical – takes on a creative role. 
* 
Siegfried Kracauer, The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays. Cambridge, MA., Harvard University Press, 1995. p. 76.Back to top